Wednesday, March 12, 2008

A Comment by Bro Ben Apacible on GLP GM's Circular 14



"Yesterday, I received and, with great sadness, read MW Jaime Y. Gonzales’ Circular No. 14 which discourages or prohibits members of the Grand Lodge of the Philippines from attending the “NO HOST FELLOWSHIP-BRETHREN ALL” scheduled on Thursday, March 13, 2008, at the Intramuros Golf Club.

He pointed out that “the ‘other Grand Jurisdictions’ referred to in the invitation may include the previously declared clandestine Independent Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands (IGLPI), and the ‘brethren of other Grand Jurisdictions’ alluded thereto also may cover those who have already been declared clandestine masons by our Grand Lodge. Thus, the members of our Grand Jurisdiction may be exposed to clandestine masons and lodges”.

When the idea of this “NO HOST FELLOWSHIP” was conceptualized, the purpose was “to ‘MEET ON THE LEVEL’ and practice in and out of their respective Lodges and Grand Jurisdictions ‘BROTHERLY LOVE, RELIEF, TRUTH, LIBERTY, EQUALITY, and FRATERNITY’” and to look forward for a more meaningful Masonic year.

The aim was to promote harmony among the brethren irrespective of Grand Jurisdictions, which is one of the basic goals of the Fraternity. Thus the invitation is open to all Brethren including those from our Grand Lodge, the Grand Lodge of Scotland, the Prince Hall Grand Lodge, the Gran Logia Nacional de Filipinas, the Soberana Grand Logia del Archipelago Filipinas, unaffiliated brethren from other Grand Lodges, and yes, the Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands. Several have already communicated their intention to attend.

I strongly adhere to the “Fundamental Law of Universal Freemasonry” which is aptly defined in the opening paragraph of our Old Charges as follows:

“The constant and strict respect of this tradition, despite the diversity of nature of the Grand Lodges or the various countries, despite the variety of the Lodges composing them, despite the particular tendencies of the Brethren of all races, all nationalities, all faiths and all opinions composing them, ensure it universal character to the Masonic Order and allows all Free-Masons to recognize each other as Brethren. These traditional rules are our cement and our bond. They are both a moral and practical nature. They set the broad outlines for the life of Grand Lodges and Lodges, and prescribe to all our Brethren intangible moral imperatives. They maintain the framework of Masonic work, perpetual quest for freedom and justice, sheltered from any religious and political quarrel. They allow Free-Masonry to constitute that true Center of Union where meet, fraternally, men who without it would have perpetually remained strangers to each other”.

The “No Host Fellowship” is not intended to discuss the rituals, principles, affairs, conflicts, and other concerns of the Brethren’s respective Grand or Subordinate Lodges. It is contemplated only to be a gathering of friends and brothers. Hence, there will be no Masonic intercourse.

It is neither a Lodge nor Masonic District meeting, for which reasons the prohibitions cited in the Circular will not apply. The Most Worshipful Grand Master, I most respectfully believe, should have nothing to fear that we will violate any of our Masonic charges and obligations. What we contemplate to do is to practice the true universality of Masonry, according to the Old Charges, as well as the virtues and morals of tolerance and brotherly love, with which we are inculcated in our Lodges.

Allow me to quote Illustrious Albert Pike who said, citing Illustrious Philippe Dupin:

“Can it be truly said that … Masonry has performed its mission, when in its bosom men see restored to life and activity again, one of those very monsters, to wage war against and overthrow which was its chief purpose. I mean INTOLERANCE. Have we not seen one branch of the great Masonic Family proscribe another, and launch against it anathemas, seek to close against it all the Temples, shun its members as if accursed with pestilence, command the places to be purified, where their feet had trodden, and practices as well as by opinions, bring back the times of superstition, prosecution and intolerance? So that, while in the outer world the Protestant lives in peace by the side of the Catholic, or Israelite; when the old religions have laid down the arms with which they have long warred against each other, Masonry still sets the example of that impious strife of Brother against Brother! … Let us incessantly repeat … that the work which Masonry has to do will never be ended, so long as there remains a Truth to be defended, and error to be combated, an ignorant man to be instructed, an unfortunate to be assisted, or a Brother to be loved. He who professes these maxims is a regular Mason. He who holds other doctrines is but a spurious Brother.”

Freemasonry is not a fountain, giving health and beauty to a single Lodge or Grand Lodge, and quenching the thirst only of those dwelling near it. Freemasonry is a mighty stream, penetrating though every hill and mountain, and gliding through every field and valley of the earth, bearing in its beneficent bosom the abundant waters of understanding and tolerance to all those who leave without its Circle and love and charity for all people of every land.

With these thoughts, I will be present in the “No Host Fellowship – Brethren All” on March 13, 2008, and continue to support future endeavors of the same nature, if only to contribute to the harmony of the Craft throughout the world and leave a legacy to future Filipino Masons that I have done my part to prove to the world that Masons, irregardless of Grand Jurisdiction, can “MEET ON THE LEVEL” and in “HARMONY” and that truly ”Masonry is the Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God”.

May the GAOTU continue to bless and guide all Masons withersoever dispersed."

Bro. Ben Apacible, PM, PDDGM
Kalilayan Lodge No. 37, Lucena City
Araw Lodge No. 18, Manila
Grand Lodge of the Philippines

4 comments:

FilMasons NSW said...

Brethren:

The Grand Master issued the circular prohibiting members of GLP from attending the no host-fellowship for the simple reason that clandestine brethren from clandestine grand lodge(s) maybe attending which could result to DISHARMONY when, under the influence of liquor and other alcoholic beverages, attendees start to discuss and debate on Edict 232.

For who can prevent anybody from opening the topic and insists on saying the issuance of the said edict was wrong, and the others responding to depend and insist the rightfulness of the Edict.

Therefore, there is no guarantee of peaceful co-existence among the brethren of the GLP and the IGLPI present at the fellowship when clasp of different and adverse opinions and beliefs will start. Let us wait for the unfication of our grand jurisdictions if ever it will come.

It is said that the supposed aim of the planned fellowship is to promote harmony among the brethren and not intended to discuss the rituals, principles, affairs, conflicts and other concerns; and to practice the true universality of masonry according to the old charges.

But the old charges talk only to the brethren of duly established and recognized grand lodges worldwide and not under a declared clandestine grand lodge, so how can it be avoided to create DISHARMONY when everybody, during the fellowship, will talk freely and ask intriguing and irritating questions and/or reply adversely to queries as members of their respective grand lodges?

So brethren, to avoid creating further division and disharmony among us masons, including those from the "other jurisdictions" , it is my position and further urge the brethren to just simply refrain and totally ignore from attending the no-host fellowship.

Thank you.

Bro James Olayvar CPA
Grand Lodge Auditor (Member, Committee on Accounts ) (GLP)
Senior Warden, Kagitingan Lodge No. 286, Makati City (GLP)
Charter Master, GrandSec Reynold S Fajardo Memorial Lodge UD (GLP)
Dual Members, Gen Artemio Ricarte Lodge No. 322, Fort Bonifacio, MM (GLP)
Las Pinas Lodge No. 332, Las Pinas City (GLP)
Honorary Member, Batong Buhay No. 27, Makati City (GLP)
Auditor, Maginoo Shrine Oasis, Manila (GLP)
Member, Pilipinas York Rite, Manila (GLP)
7 Years Finacial Secretary, Knight of Columbus Marian Council No. 5311, Ermita, Manila
Member, Fourth Degree, K of C Manila Assembly, Pope Pious Center, Ermita, Manila

FilMasons NSW said...

Mga Kuyang,

When the Spanish monarchy and General Franco OUTLAWED Masonry and persecuted ALL MASONS, they did NOT care nor distinguished whatever (is) their Grand Lodge affiliation, be they GLOE, GOE or Gran Oriente de Espana. All MASONS suffered from such PERSECUTION.

In the Philippines, Masons of different Grand Lodge affiliation joined hands and fought for freedom, liberty and democracy. Many of them were members of the Gran Oriente Espanol which is NOT recognized by the Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands and many American Grand Lodges. They are our Filipino heroes who by GLP definitions are deemed "clandestines" .

Kuya Ben, I respect GENUINE Brother Masons who seeks HARMONY and UNITY. I do NOT respect and discountenance any Brother who violates our anti-ELECTIONEERING laws; are responsible for the COLLAPSE of ACACIA (Fund), are CHARGED with IMMORALITY and DISQUALIFICATION cases, violates their promise - their pledges, create and supports "phantom clandestine lodges", violates the Constitution and the Masonic Justice System, who strayed from the true and original meanings and teachings of Masonry.

Mga Kuyang, we all know the singular effort of GM Gonzales who communicates with some of our IGLPI stalwarts, texted them, talk to them one-on-one, convincing them to return back to the "phantom clandestine lodge", meets them and even seeks a larger audience , but refuses to sit down with us to discuss the issues which separates us further and further; as he imposed the condition that there is only one GL and one GM.

Truly Circular 14, in a further analysis is afraid that the TRUTH will come out, that INJUSTICES will be revealed, and that REFORMS will be sought.

There is nothing to fear in this fellowship as we were NOT afraid of our few members returning back to the "phantom clandestine lodges" of the GLP after their audience with the GM and PGMs of GLP.

So WHO COMMUNICATES WITH WHOM?

Our Century old Lodges are OLDER than the GLPI / GLP. Our Cavite Lodge No 2 is one of her creators. Our Lodges are NOT declared clandestine and hence our members are NOT clandestine. Hence up to now, they have NOT complied with PGM Sorsabal GM of California requirements to define who are the clandestine lodges.

Circular 14 is a sad story. We had been sitting down with Masons of other Grand Lodge jurisdictions to include the GLP. There is NO difference. We satisfied ALL the Standards of Recognition except the controversial "exclusive territorial jurisdiction" which is now violated by many.

Many of our members will attend the no host fellowship with the instruction NOT to discuss any issue about IGLPI-GLP controversy.

We just talk about life, the economy, the country, the birds and the bees. No debate. No drinking that may incite passions.

The fellowship is not the proper forum to discuss common problems between us.We will meet you on the LEVEL, act by the PLUMB and part by the SQUARE.We should know "who is a Mason".

It will be pleasant to sit down with Brethren from the Gran Logia Soberano del Archipelago de Filipinas of GOE, the Gran Logia Nacional de Filipinas of the Supremo Consejo del Grado 33 Para Filipinas AASR, the shortlived UGLP of Leyte-Samar, the Mabuhay Lodge of Prince Hall Grand Lodge, the Perla del Oriente Lodge of the Grand Lodge of Scotland.

Ano kaya, tagay na lang tayo sa pondohan ni Kapule. Wala pang Circular 14.

Mabuhay ang MASONERYA sa Filipinas.

Bro Jim

Bro Jaime V Bantolo, PGM, IGLPI
PDDGM MD Nr 2, GLP
PDGL, PGLI, of GLP
PM Bagong Buhay Lodge No 17, GLP

Unknown said...

To all Mason, it is now time to ease down this so called battle of sovrerignty in our own land, after all we are created equal. We are of different mothers but under one canopy of heaven. If we tend to extend help to those who are not among us, much more to them who carries the same working tools, who have gone and did the same.

HER. DELPILAR
MAGDALO 79.

FilMasons NSW said...

Definitely we [Masons] should follow our own taching of tolerance. We tolerate& respect our Brother's [everyone else'] religious & political beliefs; in the same vein we should tolerate which Grand Body & what sort of Lodge he is affiliated. We follow the same teachings; and that should we follow the great dictum ... "that noble contention, or rather emulation, of who best can work and best agree."