Reposted from a recent email newsletter by Bro Ed Halpaus.
Original article appeared on the August 1960 issue of the Philalethes Society.
The Philalethes Society [or the Masonic Philalethes Society - MPS] is an international Masonic research society. The name is "derived from two Greek words, philos and alethes. It means lover of truth [Fiat Lux]. The Philalethes Society was founded on October 1, 1928, by a group of Masonic Students. It was designed for Freemasons desirous of seeking and spreading Masonic light.
In 1946 The Philalethes Magazine was established to publish articles by and for its members. The sole purpose of this Research Society is to act as a clearing house for Masonic knowledge. It exchanges ideas, researches problems confronting Freemasonry, and passes them along to the Masonic world.
Its membership consists of Members and 40 Fellows who are Master Masons in good standing in a Regular Masonic Lodge anywhere in the world. Today the Society has members within 185 Regular Grand Lodges."
----------------------
Masonic Snobs by Bro Bliss Kelly, [MPS, Okla].
In a Masonic Lodge all ranks are leveled and all distinctions donnish [banish?]. The general and the private are equals within the sacred walls of the Lodge, and the laborer, the professor, the mechanic and the industrialist, the common man and the famous meet upon that level which only Masons can truly understand.
Masonry has prided itself, that it regards no man for his worldly wealth or honors and that it is the internal and not the external qualifications of a man which should recommend him to be made a Mason.
These principles are impressed upon every candidate many times as he passes through the ritual of the degrees. If any one thing may be said to be stressed more than any other it is this insistence upon equality. It is also said that every man should be accorded that respect which is due him because of his achievements, but no true Mason expects anything more than respect from other Masons.
Why, then, are there some Blue Lodges which require all officers to appear at all communications dressed in formal clothing? Does this tend to promote the idea of equality? Does it create a desire to attend Lodge on the part of those who do not have (or want) formal attire? Or, does it make him feel out of place or on a lower level than those who strut in tuxedos?
When an officer of such a Lodge is asked such questions he explains formal dress adds dignity and impressiveness to the ritualistic work and proceedings of the Lodge.
This may be true but what kind of dignity? The stonemason who observes the judges of a supreme court, clothed in black robes and sitting in high-backed chairs upon elevated benches, is impressed with the dignity of the court. But is there any equality there? These judges have the power to take away his property, his wife, his children even his life.
There are those who would go to the other extreme. Recently, on a hot summer day, an Entered Apprentice degree was being conferred by a team without coats and a man who presided in the East wearing a battered straw hat and a wad of tobacco in his cheek, with no tie and his shirt unbuttoned at the neck. The candidate was not impressed; in fact, he never returned to receive the other degrees.
Contrasting this was a Master Mason degree conferred in a country Lodge which had the ancient pot-bellied stove for heat no carpets and painted boxes for pedestals and an altar. Yet, the proceedings were highly dignified. The team was composed of two farmers, one merchant, a lawyer, a rural mail carrier, a teacher and a certificate teacher of the work. It was impossible to determine, from appearances or actions, the occupations of any of them: The rural mail carrier, a teacher and Master: The candidate was almost overwhelmed with the great lessons of the degree, expressing a desire to begin working in the Lodge as soon as he could prepare himself.
Then there are those Lodges whose members seem to think they are superior in some way to members of other Lodges, and want to convert their meeting places into country clubs or town clubs, hoping to attract "high class" men as members. Is this Masonry, or merely a means of indirectly soliciting members? Can one Masonic Lodge be "better" or more "high class" than any other?
These are challenging questions in this fast-changing world, and merit serious discussion. Many believe that the attitude of the Masonic Fraternity should change to meet these conditions; that the mere recital of ritual is not attractive enough to bring rank-and-file members to Lodge meetings, and insist that something more must be offered.
Fraternization with other members at Lodge meetings, usually mentioned as a central attraction, has little to offer. The active workers and officers are too busy for anything more than friendly greetings and the others are mostly old men whose minds dwell in the past. What is there to do besides sit in uncomfortable chairs and watch incompetent degree teams stumble and falter in conferring the work?
Most Lodges have tried socials and evenings of entertainment for members and their families. Attendance is seldom good, and so very few of these are planned.
Some Lodges are now planning to build recreation and entertainment facilities around a centrally located Lodge hall. Some plan to add a golf course, swimming pool and other facilities where members and their families may enjoy themselves or the families can amuse themselves while members are attending Lodge meetings.
What would be the cost of all these things, and how high would dues and assessments have to be to pay for all this? Would this attract the well-to-do who could afford such luxuries and drive away the common man?
Wouldn't this make greater Masonic snobs out of the members of such Lodges?
After all, Masonry must be kept upon the level of equality and Masons must meet upon that level: otherwise, it will deteriorate into a social fraternity and lose its identity as Masonry, ancient and unchanging.
True Masonry needs nothing more than its landmarks and its ritual to make it attractive to every good man, when it is properly viewed. The difficulty seems to be that we expect Masonry to be all things to all men. It was never intended to be that.
When Masonry has conferred its degrees and taught its members the sublime principles for which it stands, it has laid that foundation upon which to build a righteous life, and its work is finished. From there on, it is up to the individual members to practice brotherly love, relief and truth, acting upon the plumb of rectitude, meeting upon the level of equality and parting upon the square of virtue and morality.
In that case there can be no Masonic snobs.
------------------------
This article by Bro Kelly; which was written more than half a century ago, is still true today as it is when it was first written in the 60's. Reaslistically, class distinctions can not be banished altogether - there were several political "philosophers" [Lenin and Mao, to name a few] who have tried to create such classless society but failed. It seems no amount of laws could and can dictate how human beings act. People will find ways to corrupt laws and find loopholes to circumvent for their own selfish ends.
Thus the way of Masonry - changing its adherents one at a time in their hearts. Teaching them that this world might not be perfect but we need to strive to be as upright as best as we could - not only towards our brethren, their widows and orphans but towards all mankind. And what better way to start the process but within ourselves [in our hearts]; in our Lodges and churches, and our community. Beginning with ourselves and day to day actions and hopefully by setting a good example we can convince others the way of Masonry.
As enunciated by Bro Joseph Fort Newton in his book, "The Builders" -
"... when Masonry, instead of identifying itself with particular schemes of reform, and thus becoming involved in endless turmoil and dispute, estranging men whom she seeks to bless, devotes all her benign energy and influence to ennobling the souls of men, she is doing fundamental work in behalf of all high enterprises. By as much as she succeeds, every noble cause succeeds; by as much as she fails, everything fails! By its ministry to the individual man--drawing him into the circle of a great friendship, exalting his faith, refining his ideals, enlarging his sympathies, and setting his feet in the long white path--Masonry best serves society and the state."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Let us not kid ourselves and dream of perfect Lodge where all members sing kumbaya in the same pitch. Freemasonry is still composed of mortals with very human flaws. Snobs comes from all corners i.e. professionals-only clique, Lodges for certain race/colors, even clubs composed of certain nationality. To use the word "Masonic Snobs" is to imply that the Fratenity is "tainted" with some undesirable characters. Being snobish is not confined to our Craft, it is just the nature of being human or being a mortal. By the way, what is wrong with dressing up for something that is considered important? Have we not learned the lesson of "decorating important undertaking?" I dont see any problem in showing up in Sunday service in jeans IF that jeans is the best outfit one could offer. It is different when one ofted for "lesser" standard because it is inconvenient to exert more effort.
Post a Comment